watermark logo

Up next

BEYOND CENSORSHIP: DESTROYING FREE THOUGHT ONLINE

9 Views· 14 Dec 2021

https://www.bitchute.com/video/vQnu4k5WSSyc/


⁣BEYOND CENSORSHIP: DESTROYING FREE THOUGHT ONLINE

Show more

 2 Comments sort   Sort By


mindtaker
mindtaker 5 months ago

its their platform.
solutions:
-stop using their platform and delete your accounts.
-fund/build your own online space or start attending local event or start hosting local event for your kind.

0    0 Reply
Dangerous Television
Dangerous Television 5 months ago

If I had a major website:
#1. Everybody gets to talk. Racists..feminists...flat-earthers...EVERYBODY!! And they'd have their own sections within the site. The only things you couldn't do is dox ppl. or threaten ppl.'s lives.
#2. I'd pay people for debates. Whoever wins gets a financial reward.
#3. I'd pay video uploaders based on the quality of their video, not quanity.
#4. Try to find a way for video uploaders to get paid other than advertising.

1    0 Reply
TheMessiahsOurSavior
TheMessiahsOurSavior 5 months ago

Sounds like a pretty good idea. But I would not allow overt racism against blacks, extreme vulgarity, or sexual immorality, esp homosexuality. You have to have SOME standards when it comes to basic morals otherwise the evil ones justify what they lust for and censor anything to do with moral standards. That's why homosexuality, which is destructive to strong families and civilizations, is being protected, defended, and promoted while moral values are frowned upon.

   0    0
Dangerous Television
Dangerous Television 5 months ago

@1PathwaytoFreedom: I think plenty of people would love to debate an overt racist with extreme vulgarity....and win money while doing it? Maybe that would make the racist think twice about being racist? You'd also be able to freely debate homosexuals...you can't do that today.

   1    0
TheMessiahsOurSavior
TheMessiahsOurSavior 5 months ago

It depends on what you mean by racist, a lot of bm seem to think any non black person willing to have sex with them couldn't be racist. LOL. I totally disagree with that, if anything they are even more dangerous because they tend to infect their black friends and lovers with the same anti-blackness disease traditonally used as a pretext for anti black abuse, disrespect, and exploitation. Homosexuals, and anti black racists who want to keep blacks impovished and at odds are both dead in their sins. I don't think blacks can debate a racist; trying to get them to accept blacks that way when most such blacks can't even stand themselves and are just as hateful and cold hearted if not more so to each other based upon their racial traits then many non black racists are. They are the fault of why others are being racists toward blacks. It's the same reason so many blacks act so similar to a racist towards other blacks. It is also the root of why so many blacks have adapted to and accept homosexuality as normal contrary to how they used to view it; to their own detriment. From the public school system, media indoctrination, and normalization, to the intentional association of it with the black civil rights struggle that is mostly ignored when it comes to blacks but given overboard honor to protect, endorse, fund, and encourage the practice of homosexuality. And to benefit anyone else coming down the pike ahead of and often at the expense of blacks. Homosexuality undermines the basis for civilized human existence and their intended contribution and value system within society. It should not be defended by anyone, let alone debated about.

   1    0
mindtaker
mindtaker 5 months ago

BS because many black owned social site is quick to ban people for having different opinion.

   0    0
Show more

Up next